
“Faith never knows where it is being led, but it loves and knows the One who is leading.“
~ Oswald Chambers ~
I’ve been working on it ever since and dare say that it is the most difficult writing I have done in a long, long time. But I also feel that it is perhaps the most important writing I have done in a long, long time.
Why am I telling you this? Because I want you to demonstrate a forgiving and charitable spirit as you read because my efforts are surely less than perfect, but heart-felt nonetheless.I start by asking you to pause for a moment, take a deep breath and ask yourself if you, as a person of faith, can ever imagine yourself writing any of the following to or about a fellow blogger and professed Christian:
[B]oth [posts] were so full of such bitterness, poor logic, and bad theology that I really didn’t peruse her entire blog. I didn’t want to.
![]()
![]()
The fruits of the Spirit are “love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, kindness, gentleness, and self-control.” I find little of that in what she chooses to show in her writings. I fear that if she tested the Spirit that she says is guiding her, that it would prove to be of Satan, not of God.
I am sick of to death of immature “Christians” who would sacrifice the fellowship of all believers because they are hurt by what someone SAID to them, when people are dying for their faith, enslaved for their faith, and persecuted for their faith,daily. Grow up.My prayers that the real Holy Spirit someday brings her to true faith and repentance still stand.Those are just four very short excerpts from much longer e-mails, posts and comments written to and about me by a female blogger who professes the name of Christ Jesus. More specifically, the woman claims to be the wife of a currently employed pastor.To summarize, this is what she said to/about me:
1. I am bitter.
2. I am illogical.
3. I am theologically illiterate.
4. I am following Satan, not the Divine.
5. I am not a Christian. In fact, she essentially told me that twice: First by telling me that my “stance” is not founded upon Christian principles and again by referring to me as a “Christian,” using quotation marks to indicate her belief that I am not really a Christian.
6. I have no true faith.
7. I have not repented for whatever sins I have, in her estimation, committed.
Whew! That’s quite an inventory of shortcomings.
What have you concluded? Could or would you ever say or write such statements to or about another human being? If so, under what circumstances can you imagine yourself doing so? If not, why not? What would preclude you from making such remarks? Personal characteristics such as shyness? Insufficient confidence in your Scriptural prowess? Or …?
I invite and will welcome your candid feedback.
I created this blog shortly after I was compelled to leave the institutional church upon reaching the painful and ugly realization that evil was dwelling in that congregation and fueling the behavior of the pastor and some of those who followed him and did his bidding. Writing was and is a therapeutic mechanism by which to evaluate, clarify and give voice to my feelings and opinions … and continue the process of empowerment I began when I found the courage to turn my back on organized religion, finally acknowledging my lifelong perception and understanding of myself as a very square peg trying by any means possible to fit into a decidedly round hole.
I did not start blogging to win a popularity contest. I don’t aspire to having the most heavily trafficked blog on the Internet or winning any awards. I’m extremely grateful that anyone at all reads what I write.
I have had the pleasure of interacting with many other bloggers who declare themselves to be people of faith and thoroughly enjoy reading what those folks have to say each week. I am enriched by their presence here in cyberspace.
I haven’t posted much in the past week because, although I stated publicly that I had no intention of giving up blogging about my faith and spirituality, in private, I have been contemplating just that. However, as usual, the Holy Spirit isn’t having it and has told me several times by different means that I am meant to forge on.
One of those mechanisms was Rob Witham’s eloquent post, “Religious Tolerance as Christian Value.” The text upon which he based his article, Romans 14:1–13, spoke volumes to me (as did this week’s quote) –
Welcome those who are weak in faith, but not for the purpose of quarreling over opinions … Who are you to pass judgment on servants of another? It is before their own lord that they stand or fall. And they will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make them stand … Let us therefore no longer pass judgment on one another, but resolve instead never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of another.
I do not always succeed, obviously, but I try each day to live my live in conformity with these guidelines:
But I say to you who hear, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. Whoever hits you on the cheek, offer him the other also; … Treat others the same way you want them to treat you. If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them. If you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners do the same. If you lend to those from whom you expect to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners in order to receive back the same amount. But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High; for He Himself is kind to ungrateful and evil men. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.Do not judge, and you will not be judged; and do not condemn, and you will not be condemned; pardon, and you will be pardoned.
Luke 6:27–37
When I responded to the poster in question, I was admittedly angry. She deleted my entire comment from her blog, but part of what I said to her was this:
You have no right to make such statements about other Christians. None. When you do so, you demonstrate to the atheists and agnostics of the world why they should have nothing to do with so-called ‘God-fearing Christians’ who are incapable of displaying love and acceptance to each other, not to mention degrading the name of the Savior you claim to worship. SHAME ON YOU.
She left only her own comments on her blog for others to read, including this passage:
God does give us the right and the responsibility to judge things according to Scripture, just not to think that our works are more righteous than those others.“For there are many insubordinate, both the talkers and deceivers … whose mouths must be stopped who subvert whole households, teaching things which they ought not for the sake of dishonest gain. One of them, a prophet of their own said “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, and lazy gluttons.” (Sounds a lot how you describe Christians who actually believe what Scripture teaches about the church)
“This testimony is true. Therefore, rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the faith, not giving heed to Jewish fables and commandments of men who turn from the truth. To the pure all things are pure, but to those who are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but even their mind and conscience are defiled. They profess to know God but in works they deny Him, being abominable, disobedient, and disqualified for every good work.” Titus 1:10–16
The Bible must be read and cited consistent with its historical and theological context. So let’s examine the verse quoted by the pastor’s wife.
Paul’s letter to Titus parallels his message in 1 Timothy. Titus was a Greek whom Paul himself converted (Titus 1:4). Paul sent him on a mission to Corinth and, when he returned, sent him back to help the Corinthian congregation collect offerings for the poor in Jerusalem. When Paul was released after being imprisoned in Rome for the first time, he put Titus in charge of the church on Crete (Titus 1:5) and the last information known about him is that he went to Dalmatia, presumably to do further mission work (2 Timothy 4:10).
Titus is referred to by Bible scholars as a “Pastoral” book, addressed to Titus to prepare him for his responsibilities running the church. It is not entirely clear why, having just seen Titus and presumably having discussed these matters in person, he felt it necessary to write him with such detailed information concerning qualifications for those in the church who would hold offices and positions of leadership. Some scholars speculate that the letters were meant to strengthen Titus and Timothy’s position as his personal representatives, exemplified by suggestions in Titus that the working conditions on Crete were less than ideal. The letters are considered practical in their approach in comparison to Paul’s theological treatises.
The first third of the letter to Titus dealt with “insubordinate persons, empty talkers and Judaizing deceivers who upset whole families and taught their heresies merely to make money.” Specifically, they claimed to be teachers of the Law, but did not understand its true meaning and its role in the life of Christians. Among the issues about which false teaching had been practiced were circumcision, marriage and the eating of certain foods. In particular, the first chapter of Titus was intended to impart advice about the requisite qualifications for bishops, elders and deacons.
Paul’s words to Titus were never intended to be used by one Christian as a sword with which to attack and tear down another Christian. More importantly, they were never meant to justify an ad hominem attack upon another Christian.
And if you examine the words of the pastor’s wife carefully, you will see that all she has done is attack me on the most personal levels, seeing fit to question my faith, my ability to discern messages from spirits and demons, whether or not I have a contrite heart and, indeed, my very belief in Jesus Christ.
She could have disagreed with my viewpoints, interpretations of Scripture, faith practices and writings on subject topics by engaging in civil discourse, informed intellectual debate, reasoned discussion, but she chose not to. In fact, I extended a special invitation to her. I e-mailed her my post announcing “Guest Bloggers on the Horizon,” reaching out to her to ask that she participate so that we could engage in a meaningful dialogue here. Predictably, she declined, citing time factors even though I made clear that guests can submit articles they have already published on their own blogs. (She said: “I have a blog, I don’t have enough time to post on my blog. That being the case, I’m not going to post on someone else’s. I hope that it is a good experience for you.”)
The pastor’s wife made one correct statement, but then failed to behave in conformity with it: “God does give us the right and the responsibility to judge things according to Scripture” [emphasis added]. Things.
The Divine does not give us the right to judge other human beings.
I did not know when I started this blog where my faith would lead me. But I know who and what takes the lead in all aspects of my life, including my writing here. I know. And the Divine knows. That’s all that matters.
I have no idea what the pastor’s wife hoped to accomplish with her hateful words. Did she think that she could change my mind about some aspect of faith discussed here? Or was she trying to reassure herself? I’ll never know what motivated her.
What I do know is that her behavior strengthened and further solidified my faith, my convictions, my belief is the correctness of my choices. When we are tested, we grow more steadfast and determined.
On the Horizon was envisioned and founded to be a safe place to exchange viewpoints. It was conceived and launched in response to close-mindedness; constrained, conventional and limited thinking; and the systematic exclusion of persons who refused to go along with “group think,” instead espousing their own reasoned opinions. It will be nothing less.
I don’t know where my faith will take me from here. Perhaps I am writing in a vacuum and no one is reading my words. Perhaps you will not return after reading this article. Perhaps you nodding your head in agreement as you read this, but will not reach out and leave a comment. None of that really matters because it is the Holy Spirit’s voice that I hear and, at least for now, it is saying “Carry on, faithful servant.” So that is what I plan to do. I hope that you will join me.
“Let us therefore no longer pass judgment on one another, but resolve instead never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of another.”


Trackposted to Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Republic, Big Dog’s Weblog, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, Adeline and Hazel, Pet’s Garden Blog, Rightlinx, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, stikNstein… has no mercy, Pirate’s Cove, Nuke’s news and views, The Pink Flamingo, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, , The Random Yak, A Blog For All, 123beta, guerrilla radio, DeMediacratic Nation, Maggie’s Notebook, Adam’s Blog, Webloggin, Cao’s Blog, MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, Phastidio.net, The Bullwinkle Blog, Colloquium, Conservative Cat, Jo’s Café, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Faultline USA, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.








{ 3 comments }
I think we as Christians sometimes miss the point completely to minister to others.
We do not know each other’s hearts – only our Lord knows what is going on in your heart and the relationship with Him
I am very sorry that you experiencing this from another Christian.
Thank you for sharing your heart with us today
I am lifting you up to Him – to the only One whos opinion truly matters.
Be blessed today and always.
One more curiosity-driven question – I come from a non-denominational background, and am not familiar at all with a lot of the major denominations (like Lutherans).
Do you have a post somewhere that just shares your own testimony of how you came to Christ, and what led you out of the Lutheran denomination? Again, I’m sincerely curious (aka nosy), and truly interested in your background. And that’s all.
Thanks.
You raise an interesting point when you highlight the distinction between a dialogue about differing viewpoints and personal attacks. They are not the same. We will never all agree on everything. However, it is quite possible to disagree in love and learn from one another. Sadly, some people are not willing to have a conversation that does not completely agree with them.
Comments on this entry are closed.