In “other” Words: Who and What is Leading YOU?

by Hopeful Spirit on Tuesday, June 12, 2007



“Faith never knows where it is being led, but it loves and knows the One who is lead­ing.“

~ Oswald Chambers ~
I tried to write this post last week, but as I men­tioned in my Thank­ful Thurs­day entry, Blog­ger then sent it to the abyss.

I’ve been work­ing on it ever since and dare say that it is the most dif­fi­cult writ­ing I have done in a long, long time. But I also feel that it is per­haps the most impor­tant writ­ing I have done in a long, long time.

Why am I telling you this? Because I want you to demon­strate a for­giv­ing and char­i­ta­ble spirit as you read because my efforts are surely less than per­fect, but heart-felt nonethe­less.I start by ask­ing you to pause for a moment, take a deep breath and ask your­self if you, as a per­son of faith, can ever imag­ine your­self writ­ing any of the fol­low­ing to or about a fel­low blog­ger and pro­fessed Chris­t­ian:

[B]oth [posts] were so full of such bit­ter­ness, poor logic, and bad the­ol­ogy that I really didn’t peruse her entire blog. I didn’t want to.

The fruits of the Spirit are “love, joy, peace, patience, good­ness, kind­ness, gen­tle­ness, and self-control.” I find lit­tle of that in what she chooses to show in her writ­ings. I fear that if she tested the Spirit that she says is guid­ing her, that it would prove to be of Satan, not of God.

And I am not uninformed…to this day, I have read three of her posts all telling the same story, and know­ing Scrip­ture, it is clear that her stance is unscrip­tural, unlutheran, and not Chris­t­ian in the least — and full of bit­ter­ness and superficiality.

I am sick of to death of imma­ture “Chris­tians” who would sac­ri­fice the fel­low­ship of all believ­ers because they are hurt by what some­one SAID to them, when peo­ple are dying for their faith, enslaved for their faith, and per­se­cuted for their faith,daily. Grow up.My prayers that the real Holy Spirit some­day brings her to true faith and repen­tance still stand.Those are just four very short excerpts from much longer e-mails, posts and com­ments writ­ten to and about me by a female blog­ger who pro­fesses the name of Christ Jesus. More specif­i­cally, the woman claims to be the wife of a cur­rently employed pastor.To sum­ma­rize, this is what she said to/about me:

1. I am bit­ter.
2. I am illog­i­cal.
3. I am the­o­log­i­cally illit­er­ate.
4. I am fol­low­ing Satan, not the Divine.
5. I am not a Chris­t­ian. In fact, she essen­tially told me that twice: First by telling me that my “stance” is not founded upon Chris­t­ian prin­ci­ples and again by refer­ring to me as a “Chris­t­ian,” using quo­ta­tion marks to indi­cate her belief that I am not really a Chris­t­ian.
6. I have no true faith.
7. I have not repented for what­ever sins I have, in her esti­ma­tion, committed.

Whew! That’s quite an inven­tory of shortcomings.

What have you con­cluded? Could or would you ever say or write such state­ments to or about another human being? If so, under what cir­cum­stances can you imag­ine your­self doing so? If not, why not? What would pre­clude you from mak­ing such remarks? Per­sonal char­ac­ter­is­tics such as shy­ness? Insuf­fi­cient con­fi­dence in your Scrip­tural prowess? Or …?

I invite and will wel­come your can­did feedback.

I cre­ated this blog shortly after I was com­pelled to leave the insti­tu­tional church upon reach­ing the painful and ugly real­iza­tion that evil was dwelling in that con­gre­ga­tion and fuel­ing the behav­ior of the pas­tor and some of those who fol­lowed him and did his bid­ding. Writ­ing was and is a ther­a­peu­tic mech­a­nism by which to eval­u­ate, clar­ify and give voice to my feel­ings and opin­ions … and con­tinue the process of empow­er­ment I began when I found the courage to turn my back on orga­nized reli­gion, finally acknowl­edg­ing my life­long per­cep­tion and under­stand­ing of myself as a very square peg try­ing by any means pos­si­ble to fit into a decid­edly round hole.

I did not start blog­ging to win a pop­u­lar­ity con­test. I don’t aspire to hav­ing the most heav­ily traf­ficked blog on the Inter­net or win­ning any awards. I’m extremely grate­ful that any­one at all reads what I write.

I have had the plea­sure of inter­act­ing with many other blog­gers who declare them­selves to be peo­ple of faith and thor­oughly enjoy read­ing what those folks have to say each week. I am enriched by their pres­ence here in cyberspace.

I haven’t posted much in the past week because, although I stated pub­licly that I had no inten­tion of giv­ing up blog­ging about my faith and spir­i­tu­al­ity, in pri­vate, I have been con­tem­plat­ing just that. How­ever, as usual, the Holy Spirit isn’t hav­ing it and has told me sev­eral times by dif­fer­ent means that I am meant to forge on.

One of those mech­a­nisms was Rob Witham’s elo­quent post, “Reli­gious Tol­er­ance as Chris­t­ian Value.” The text upon which he based his arti­cle, Romans 14:1–13, spoke vol­umes to me (as did this week’s quote) –

Wel­come those who are weak in faith, but not for the pur­pose of quar­rel­ing over opin­ions … Who are you to pass judg­ment on ser­vants of another? It is before their own lord that they stand or fall. And they will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make them stand … Let us there­fore no longer pass judg­ment on one another, but resolve instead never to put a stum­bling block or hin­drance in the way of another.

I do not always suc­ceed, obvi­ously, but I try each day to live my live in con­for­mity with these guidelines:

But I say to you who hear, love your ene­mies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mis­treat you. Who­ever hits you on the cheek, offer him the other also; … Treat oth­ers the same way you want them to treat you. If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? For even sin­ners love those who love them. If you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? For even sin­ners do the same. If you lend to those from whom you expect to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sin­ners lend to sin­ners in order to receive back the same amount. But love your ene­mies, and do good, and lend, expect­ing noth­ing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High; for He Him­self is kind to ungrate­ful and evil men. Be mer­ci­ful, just as your Father is mer­ci­ful.Do not judge, and you will not be judged; and do not con­demn, and you will not be con­demned; par­don, and you will be pardoned.

Luke 6:27–37

When I responded to the poster in ques­tion, I was admit­tedly angry. She deleted my entire com­ment from her blog, but part of what I said to her was this:

You have no right to make such state­ments about other Chris­tians. None. When you do so, you demon­strate to the athe­ists and agnos­tics of the world why they should have noth­ing to do with so-called ‘God-fearing Chris­tians’ who are inca­pable of dis­play­ing love and accep­tance to each other, not to men­tion degrad­ing the name of the Sav­ior you claim to wor­ship. SHAME ON YOU.

She left only her own com­ments on her blog for oth­ers to read, includ­ing this passage:

God does give us the right and the respon­si­bil­ity to judge things accord­ing to Scrip­ture, just not to think that our works are more right­eous than those others.“For there are many insub­or­di­nate, both the talk­ers and deceivers … whose mouths must be stopped who sub­vert whole house­holds, teach­ing things which they ought not for the sake of dis­hon­est gain. One of them, a prophet of their own said “Cre­tans are always liars, evil beasts, and lazy glut­tons.” (Sounds a lot how you describe Chris­tians who actu­ally believe what Scrip­ture teaches about the church)

This tes­ti­mony is true. There­fore, rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the faith, not giv­ing heed to Jew­ish fables and com­mand­ments of men who turn from the truth. To the pure all things are pure, but to those who are defiled and unbe­liev­ing noth­ing is pure; but even their mind and con­science are defiled. They pro­fess to know God but in works they deny Him, being abom­inable, dis­obe­di­ent, and dis­qual­i­fied for every good work.” Titus 1:10–16

The Bible must be read and cited con­sis­tent with its his­tor­i­cal and the­o­log­i­cal con­text. So let’s exam­ine the verse quoted by the pastor’s wife.

Paul’s let­ter to Titus par­al­lels his mes­sage in 1 Tim­o­thy. Titus was a Greek whom Paul him­self con­verted (Titus 1:4). Paul sent him on a mis­sion to Corinth and, when he returned, sent him back to help the Corinthian con­gre­ga­tion col­lect offer­ings for the poor in Jerusalem. When Paul was released after being impris­oned in Rome for the first time, he put Titus in charge of the church on Crete (Titus 1:5) and the last infor­ma­tion known about him is that he went to Dal­ma­tia, pre­sum­ably to do fur­ther mis­sion work (2 Tim­o­thy 4:10).

Titus is referred to by Bible schol­ars as a “Pas­toral” book, addressed to Titus to pre­pare him for his respon­si­bil­i­ties run­ning the church. It is not entirely clear why, hav­ing just seen Titus and pre­sum­ably hav­ing dis­cussed these mat­ters in per­son, he felt it nec­es­sary to write him with such detailed infor­ma­tion con­cern­ing qual­i­fi­ca­tions for those in the church who would hold offices and posi­tions of lead­er­ship. Some schol­ars spec­u­late that the let­ters were meant to strengthen Titus and Timothy’s posi­tion as his per­sonal rep­re­sen­ta­tives, exem­pli­fied by sug­ges­tions in Titus that the work­ing con­di­tions on Crete were less than ideal. The let­ters are con­sid­ered prac­ti­cal in their approach in com­par­i­son to Paul’s the­o­log­i­cal treatises.

The first third of the let­ter to Titus dealt with “insub­or­di­nate per­sons, empty talk­ers and Judaiz­ing deceivers who upset whole fam­i­lies and taught their here­sies merely to make money.” Specif­i­cally, they claimed to be teach­ers of the Law, but did not under­stand its true mean­ing and its role in the life of Chris­tians. Among the issues about which false teach­ing had been prac­ticed were cir­cum­ci­sion, mar­riage and the eat­ing of cer­tain foods. In par­tic­u­lar, the first chap­ter of Titus was intended to impart advice about the req­ui­site qual­i­fi­ca­tions for bish­ops, elders and deacons.

Paul’s words to Titus were never intended to be used by one Chris­t­ian as a sword with which to attack and tear down another Chris­t­ian. More impor­tantly, they were never meant to jus­tify an ad hominem attack upon another Christian.

And if you exam­ine the words of the pastor’s wife care­fully, you will see that all she has done is attack me on the most per­sonal lev­els, see­ing fit to ques­tion my faith, my abil­ity to dis­cern mes­sages from spir­its and demons, whether or not I have a con­trite heart and, indeed, my very belief in Jesus Christ.

She could have dis­agreed with my view­points, inter­pre­ta­tions of Scrip­ture, faith prac­tices and writ­ings on sub­ject top­ics by engag­ing in civil dis­course, informed intel­lec­tual debate, rea­soned dis­cus­sion, but she chose not to. In fact, I extended a spe­cial invi­ta­tion to her. I e-mailed her my post announc­ing “Guest Blog­gers on the Hori­zon,” reach­ing out to her to ask that she par­tic­i­pate so that we could engage in a mean­ing­ful dia­logue here. Pre­dictably, she declined, cit­ing time fac­tors even though I made clear that guests can sub­mit arti­cles they have already pub­lished on their own blogs. (She said: “I have a blog, I don’t have enough time to post on my blog. That being the case, I’m not going to post on some­one else’s. I hope that it is a good expe­ri­ence for you.”)

The pastor’s wife made one cor­rect state­ment, but then failed to behave in con­for­mity with it: “God does give us the right and the respon­si­bil­ity to judge things accord­ing to Scrip­ture” [empha­sis added]. Things.

The Divine does not give us the right to judge other human beings.

I did not know when I started this blog where my faith would lead me. But I know who and what takes the lead in all aspects of my life, includ­ing my writ­ing here. I know. And the Divine knows. That’s all that mat­ters.

I have no idea what the pastor’s wife hoped to accom­plish with her hate­ful words. Did she think that she could change my mind about some aspect of faith dis­cussed here? Or was she try­ing to reas­sure her­self? I’ll never know what moti­vated her.

What I do know is that her behav­ior strength­ened and fur­ther solid­i­fied my faith, my con­vic­tions, my belief is the cor­rect­ness of my choices. When we are tested, we grow more stead­fast and determined.

On the Hori­zon was envi­sioned and founded to be a safe place to exchange view­points. It was con­ceived and launched in response to close-mindedness; con­strained, con­ven­tional and lim­ited think­ing; and the sys­tem­atic exclu­sion of per­sons who refused to go along with “group think,” instead espous­ing their own rea­soned opin­ions. It will be noth­ing less.

I don’t know where my faith will take me from here. Per­haps I am writ­ing in a vac­uum and no one is read­ing my words. Per­haps you will not return after read­ing this arti­cle. Per­haps you nod­ding your head in agree­ment as you read this, but will not reach out and leave a com­ment. None of that really mat­ters because it is the Holy Spirit’s voice that I hear and, at least for now, it is say­ing “Carry on, faith­ful ser­vant.” So that is what I plan to do. I hope that you will join me.

“Let us there­fore no longer pass judg­ment on one another, but resolve instead never to put a stum­bling block or hin­drance in the way of another.”



Track­posted to Perri Nelson’s Web­site, The Vir­tu­ous Repub­lic, Big Dog’s Weblog, The Amboy Times, Lean­ing Straight Up, Pur­su­ing Holi­ness, Ade­line and Hazel, Pet’s Gar­den Blog, Rightlinx, third world county, Woman Honor Thy­self, stikN­stein… has no mercy, Pirate’s Cove, Nuke’s news and views, The Pink Flamingo, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, , The Ran­dom Yak, A Blog For All, 123beta, guer­rilla radio, DeMe­di­a­cratic Nation, Maggie’s Note­book, Adam’s Blog, Weblog­gin, Cao’s Blog, MY Vast Right Wing Con­spir­acy, Phas­tidio.net, The Bull­win­kle Blog, Col­lo­quium, Con­ser­v­a­tive Cat, Jo’s Café, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Fault­line USA, The Crazy Rants of Saman­tha Burns, The World Accord­ing to Carl, Blue Star Chron­i­cles, Gulf Coast Hur­ri­cane Tracker, and Gone Hol­ly­wood, thanks to Link­fest Haven Deluxe.

Tech­no­rati Tags:

You might also like:

{ 3 comments }

1 eph2810 June 12, 2007 at 8:00 pm

I think we as Christians sometimes miss the point completely to minister to others.
We do not know each other’s hearts – only our Lord knows what is going on in your heart and the relationship with Him
I am very sorry that you experiencing this from another Christian.
Thank you for sharing your heart with us today :)
I am lifting you up to Him – to the only One whos opinion truly matters.

Be blessed today and always.

2 Faerylandmom June 13, 2007 at 5:20 am

One more curiosity-driven question – I come from a non-denominational background, and am not familiar at all with a lot of the major denominations (like Lutherans).

Do you have a post somewhere that just shares your own testimony of how you came to Christ, and what led you out of the Lutheran denomination? Again, I’m sincerely curious (aka nosy), and truly interested in your background. And that’s all.

Thanks. :)

3 Rob Witham July 13, 2007 at 12:23 am

You raise an interesting point when you highlight the distinction between a dialogue about differing viewpoints and personal attacks. They are not the same. We will never all agree on everything. However, it is quite possible to disagree in love and learn from one another. Sadly, some people are not willing to have a conversation that does not completely agree with them.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: