Book Review: On Their Own

by Hopeful Spirit on Sunday, October 14, 2007

Book Review: “On Their Own” by Anne Ford

Included in the Decem­ber Book­works Car­ni­val (Non­fic­tion) at A Striped Arm­chair

Hopeful Spirit of On the Horizon reveiws On Their Own by Anne FordAnne Ford has fol­lowed up her nar­ra­tive about rais­ing a child with learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties, Laugh­ing Alle­gra, with On Their Own: Cre­at­ing an Inde­pen­dent Future for Your Adult Child with Learn­ing Dis­abil­i­ties and ADHD. Her sec­ond work is the con­tin­u­a­tion of her col­lec­tion of prac­ti­cal guid­ance, resource mate­r­ial, and per­sonal experiences.

If you have raised a chil­dren or lived with another fam­ily mem­ber who has one or more learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties, there are a mul­ti­tude of “Me, too!” moments await­ing you in this vol­ume. As Ford explains at the out­set, it is dif­fi­cult to define learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties with any degree of pre­ci­sion — and harder still for per­sons with no expe­ri­ence to under­stand and relate to the expe­ri­ences of either the indi­vid­ual with the dis­abil­i­ties or their fam­ily. Yet learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties are extremely com­mon, in vary­ing degrees.

Ford takes an admirable stab at artic­u­lat­ing a work­ing def­i­n­i­tion in order to give her read­ers a frame of ref­er­ence: The term “learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties” (or, to use Ford’s abbre­vi­a­tion, sim­ply “LD”) is “not any one thing, but rather an umbrella term used to describe any num­ber of behav­iors that are unex­pected in indi­vid­u­als who are accom­plished in learn­ing in other ways.” She explains:

LD affects people’s abil­ity to inter­pret what they see and hear, or their abil­ity to link infor­ma­tion from dif­fer­ent parts of the brain, because their brain is “wired” a lit­tle dif­fer­ently. These dif­fer­ences can show up as spe­cific dif­fi­cul­ties with spo­ken and writ­ten lan­guage, with coör­di­na­tion, with self-control, or with pay­ing atten­tion. Peo­ple can have learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties in read­ing, writ­ing, and math, and in pro­cess­ing infor­ma­tion (and they can have dif­fi­cul­ties in one of these areas, two of them, or all of them). Most chil­dren and adults with LD can read words, but they may not always com­pre­hend the mean­ing of the words. Learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties can reach into per­sonal rela­tion­ships, since they often cause dif­fi­culty in com­mon, every­day inter­ac­tions with others.

With that foun­da­tion, Ford dis­cusses a broad spec­trum of ways in which per­sons with LD face chal­lenges to their abil­ity to live inde­pen­dently – and cause con­ster­na­tion for those who love them and want them to suc­ceed. For instance, she addresses the con­flict­ing emo­tions of par­ents who can­not break the well-establishing pat­tern of wor­ry­ing about their child as they send him/her out into the world, yet yearn to expe­ri­ence the nat­ural pro­gres­sion of par­ent­ing, i.e., a life free from car­ing for chil­dren. Indeed, she describes worry as “the dom­i­nat­ing emo­tion most par­ents feel about an LD child. Yes, there is joy, hap­pi­ness, fear, anger, guilt, pride, all the thousand-and-one pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive emo­tions that make them­selves known at one time or another; but worry always seems to hang around and form an under­cur­rent to all the other emo­tions. “Lessons Learned — A Check­list of Real­i­ties” is a valu­able descrip­tion of lessons learned through par­ent­ing her daugh­ter with which every other par­ent of a child with LD can empathize and relate.

Sib­lings face unique obsta­cles and emo­tional road­blocks in rela­tion­ship to the child with LD who, of neces­sity, often receives more atten­tion from the par­ent, lead­ing to resent­ment, jeal­ousy and, inevitably, guilt about those feel­ings. Because some per­sons with severe forms of LD will never be able to live entirely on their own with no super­vi­sion at all, sib­lings carry the bur­den of know­ing that they will one day be called upon to take over care­giver respon­si­bil­i­ties, while par­ents fret about aging and dying, leav­ing their other chil­dren sad­dled with the task of car­ing for their sib­ling. Ford, in her can­did but touch­ing writ­ing style, describes explain­ing to her elder child that he would one day be left to be his sister’s “guardian, her friend, and even a father fig­ure.” She wisely rec­om­mends that par­ents pre­pare a mas­ter file con­tain­ing all infor­ma­tion that will be needed by the sib­ling and inform them of its con­tents and loca­tion. Hon­est, open com­mu­ni­ca­tion, acknowl­edg­ing each fam­ily member’s con­flict­ing feel­ings can ease the even­tual tran­si­tion of care giv­ing responsibilities.

The mid­dle sec­tion of the book drags, bogged down by the fact that Ford has not delved deeply enough into the areas where she pro­vides advice for her writ­ing to be of much use to any­one who has more than a pass­ing knowl­edge of what it is like to live with an indi­vid­ual with LD. For those folks, her writ­ing here becomes sopho­moric and tedious. For some­one who has no knowl­edge of these top­ics, how­ever, this sec­tion might serve as a use­ful start­ing point, but is lim­ited by its brevity and super­fi­cial treat­ment of issues such as decid­ing whether the indi­vid­ual with LD is capa­ble of attend­ing col­lege and/or obtain­ing and main­tain­ing mean­ing­ful employment.

In Ford’s defense, the deci­sion about whether or not to include those chap­ters could not have been easy in light of the lim­i­ta­tions of this vol­ume — each one could inde­pen­dently be the topic of a whole book. Whether she included or omit­ted them, she would inevitably open her work up to this crit­i­cism. My rec­om­men­da­tion is that those chap­ters be used as ref­er­ence tools to the exten­tap­pro­pri­ate to the indi­vid­ual reader.

The most uplift­ing, inspir­ing, and, in my esti­ma­tion, valu­able part of the book is, how­ever, the final sec­tion enti­tled “Inter­views: Advice for Par­ents from Promi­nent Peo­ple with LD.” For instance, Sir Richard Bran­son describes grow­ing up think­ing “I was stu­pid. And I hap­pen to have bad eye­sight as well, and that was my other excuse. I had bad eye­sight and I thought I was stu­pid, so quite early on I had to com­pen­sate for it.” Although his learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties are mild, he recalls, “I would look at an exam paper and I might as well have been upside down.” At the age of 15, his frus­tra­tions fueled his entre­pre­neur­ial spirit – he left school to found a mag­a­zine and has never looked back. Mildly dyslexic, to this day, he takes notes dur­ing con­ver­sa­tions, and admits that he still gets his words “won­der­fully mud­dled up – some­times on tele­vi­sion.” His advice to par­ents of adult chil­dren with LD? Help them find work that they are well equipped for and enjoy.

Gas­ton Cap­eron, for­mer Gov­er­nor of West Vir­ginia and Pres­i­dent of the Col­lege Board; John Cham­bers, Pres­i­dent and CEO, Cisco Sys­tems; David Neele­man, Founder and CEO, Jet­Blue Air­ways; and Charles Schwab, Founder, Chair­man, and CEO, Charles Schwab & Co., all echo sim­i­lar expe­ri­ences and philoso­phies. Each describes feel­ing out of step with other chil­dren, believ­ing them­selves less capa­ble than oth­ers, and even­tu­ally, through per­se­ver­ance and the sup­port of pos­i­tive role mod­els, find­ing their own means of accom­mo­dat­ing their disabilities.

As Ford explains, “it’s all progress, not perfection.”

Liv­ing with LD or par­ent­ing a child with LD is an ongo­ing strug­gle, the details of which she has sum­ma­rized in a heart­felt, straight-forward, unapolo­getic man­ner. Some of the advice she offers is too sopho­moric for the savvy par­ent, but just right for those at the out­set of the jour­ney. But she never veers into self-pity, whin­ing, or com­plain­ing, even while openly shar­ing some of the frus­tra­tions she has expe­ri­enced over the years with her own daugh­ter. She empathizes with par­ents who may, in weak moments, be tempted to give up, but urges them to take a brief respite and con­tinue advo­cat­ing and car­ing for their chil­dren because the love, nur­tur­ing, and bound­less but restrained sup­port for an adult child with LD is vital to his/her abil­ity to live inde­pen­dently, con­sis­tent with his/her abilities.

Par­ents must learn to accept that the road twists in a dif­fer­ent direc­tion for them because their chil­dren have LD – “[W]e can never fully step back from their lives. Even though the cen­tral theme of this book is the neces­sity of learn­ing to let go, we know that chal­lenges and prob­lems do not end. We can learn to accept them and han­dle them, but we can never elim­i­nate them. We search for a sense of final­ity, but we never find it.” On Their Own will help par­ents and loved ones acknowl­edge, accept, and make peace with that fact.



[tags]Book Reviews[/tags]

Tech­no­rati Tags:

{ 6 comments }

1 SandyCarlson October 14, 2007 at 6:30 pm

Thanks for this insightful review of a book that sounds well worth the read. If it’s as thoughtful and well done as your review, it must be a gem.

2 CyberCelt October 14, 2007 at 6:36 pm

Good review. Not so good book. There was a big movement to go with “people first” language in the 1990s. Instead of saying or writing “LD child,” you would say “child with learning disabilities.” Instead of “blind woman,” you would say “woman who is visually impaired.” Instead of “wheelchair athletes,” you would say athletes with physical disabilities.”

It really becomes noticeable when you start talking about people with mental retardation. “Mentally retarded boy,” is stigmatizing, while “boy with mental retardation” is not. “Mentally ill man,” is demeaning,while “man with a mental illness,” is not.

We are all different. It is what makes life so exciting. I do not want to be known as “fat woman,” when “woman with weight problem,” sound so much nicer.
:mrgreen: :mrgreen:

3 Hopeful Spirit October 14, 2007 at 7:47 pm

“LD” is simply an abbreviation for “learning disabilities.” It is not a pejorative term and, you will note, my review, like the book, uses the appropriate tone and language, e.g., “persons with LD.”

It is not appropriate to say “woman who is visually impaired” if a woman is blind. You simply say “a woman who is blind.” In fact, the disability community despises the term “visually impaired” and it is never used.

Have you read the book?

4 slackermommy October 15, 2007 at 6:22 am

I will have to check that out. Three of my four children have varying degrees of processing issues and my oldest also has ADHD.

5 Jenny October 15, 2007 at 9:13 am

Sounds like an interesting read. I am always looking for new books since I’ve read everything I have. I’ll check this out. Thanks!

6 jan October 24, 2007 at 6:53 pm

Nice review. There is a great need for parents to have hope and guidance. I take issue with LD being learning disabilities – Learning differences is more appropriate by my experience – and these differences may be super abilities in some types of study. I highly recommend another new book for you all to read – “look me in the eye” which talks about Aspergers (high functioning autism) but has many cross overs into all LD situations – misfits, differently wired, logical thinking, diversity, bullying… on and on – and it’s a fun read about a guy who is incredibly articulate and has had FOUR successful careers that any parent would be proud of. I welcome your responses.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 5 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: