What My Neighbor Believes: Jehovah’s Witnesses

by Hopeful Spirit on Sunday, April 27, 2008

By Dan King, Guest Blog­ger On the Horizon

I have recently had sev­eral vis­its from some very faith­ful peo­ple who came to share the hope of their sal­va­tion with me. But as a Min­istry Leader, and an Instruc­tor at a small Bible Col­lege, why would they be so inter­ested in me? Well, accord­ing to them, I’ve got it all wrong! While I read the “same” Bible as them, we have very dif­fer­ent inter­pre­ta­tions about what we believe.

So I wanted to dig in a lit­tle bit and fig­ure out what I should believe. And as a stu­dent of the Bible, I wanted to try to stay as objec­tive as I could. I really wanted to dis­cover the truth in the dif­fer­ences between what we believed. What I dis­cov­ered is some­thing that I hope helps you to under­stand these dif­fer­ences, but also gives you some­thing prac­ti­cal to take with you when it comes to deal­ing with these differences.

I also have to say that my views have drawn praise and harsh crit­i­cism. But rather than tak­ing my word for it, and judg­ing what I have writ­ten, I sim­ply chal­lenge you to take it to the Word your­self. The best way to get to the truth is to find it on your own. Just ask the Holy Spirit to guide you in find­ing it. Here is a sum­mary of what I learned, with links to the full posts on each of these topics.

The Trans­la­tion Problem

Before I got into any fun­da­men­tal beliefs, it was impor­tant for me to under­stand the dif­fer­ence in where we were get­ting our infor­ma­tion. Tech­ni­cally, we read the “same” Bible, but dif­fer­ent trans­la­tions. The Jehovah’s Wit­ness orga­ni­za­tion uses what it called the New World Trans­la­tion, and they believe that it is the only cor­rect ver­sion. While I was not able to get my hands on one while writ­ing this series, I did read a bunch of their own mate­r­ial about this trans­la­tion. Ulti­mately, this trans­la­tion raises lots of red flags for me because of it’s secre­tive nature in who trans­lated it, and how it was trans­lated. Most other stan­dard Bible ver­sions doc­u­ment quite well who was involved, and what meth­ods are used. Hav­ing trans­parency in trans­la­tion allows peo­ple to see and ques­tion the meth­ods. Keep­ing every­thing secret does not allow for the same level of crit­i­cism, and can bring the reli­a­bil­ity of the trans­la­tion into question.

Click here to read further.

Inter­pre­ta­tion Flaws: Core Beliefs

One of the fun­da­men­tal beliefs of the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses is that Jesus has already returned and has estab­lished His King­dom here on earth. They even claim the date when this event hap­pened. One of the biggest prob­lems with this is that not only has the “date” moved sev­eral times, it is also based on flawed inter­pre­ta­tion for dat­ing spe­cific events in the Scrip­tures. The time-frame was also deter­mined by break­ing one of the fun­da­men­tal rules of exe­ge­sis. Basi­cally, it seems that spe­cific prophecy two dif­fer­ent places regard­ing two very dif­fer­ent events have been com­bined to help explain each other. One could eas­ily shat­ter this whole idea sim­ply by apply­ing some basic inter­pre­ta­tion standards.

Click here to read further.

Inter­pre­ta­tion Flaws: Reli­gious Practices

One of the prac­tices I saw that I wanted to study was the sep­a­ra­tion from any gov­ern­ment author­ity. Because the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses believe that Jesus has already returned and taken His place on the throne, estab­lish­ing a new King­dom here on earth, they do not rec­og­nize the author­ity of any other gov­ern­ment sys­tem. Not only is the lack of sub­mis­sion to gov­ern­ment author­i­ties (there is no author­ity that God has not put into place, good or bad) not Bib­li­cal, it is also founded on flawed core beliefs (men­tioned above). There also seems to be hypocrisy when they expect the pro­tec­tion of the gov­ern­ment, but refuse to par­tic­i­pate in it. They will even use the government’s jus­tice sys­tem to fight for their right to not rec­og­nize the gov­ern­ment … but don’t you have to rec­og­nize the author­ity of that jus­tice sys­tem in order to use it to fight your case?

Click here to read further.

Inter­pre­ta­tion Flaws: Diety of Jesus

While the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses accept Jesus as the proph­e­sied Mes­siah, they deny His deity. The idea here is that they look at Him as a “cre­ated being” which means that, as a cre­ation of God, He could not be God. As God’s first cre­ated being, He has been ordained as the com­ing king tasked with rul­ing over God’s King­dom. While the the­ol­ogy of the Trin­ity is one of the most dif­fi­cult things in Chris­tian­ity to truly grasp, the Scrip­tures are very clear that Jesus, while sep­a­rate from God the Father (and the Holy Spirit), is still fully God Himself.

Click here to read further.

The Role of Chris­tians in Deal­ing with Jehovah’s Witnesses

While I believe that the entire fun­da­men­tal belief sys­tem prac­ticed by the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses is wrong, I am still quite con­victed as a Chris­t­ian to present an appro­pri­ate response. Jesus never called me to debate peo­ple into sub­mis­sion or fight some­one until they say “uncle.” He did, how­ever, call me to love peo­ple. It is impor­tant to under­stand the dif­fer­ences between our belief sys­tems, but this is not a license to go pick a fight. I think that the next time my vis­i­tors come to my house, I want to do some­thing nice for them with­out debat­ing a sin­gle word. I will let my love for them as God’s cre­ated beings and my actions speak the­o­log­i­cal truths and points of doc­trine that I could ever speak to them. The rest is up to the Holy Spirit.

Click here to read further.

Amen.

Invi­ta­tion to Serve as a Guest Blogger

I invite you to con­tribute to an ongo­ing dis­cus­sion On the Hori­zon about the var­i­ous belief sys­tems and, more par­tic­u­larly, what the many dif­fer­ent churches believe and teach. The invi­ta­tion extends to those who, like me, are spir­i­tu­ally walk­ing beyond the walls of orga­nized reli­gion and per­sons of all dif­fer­ent faiths, not just Chris­tians, in order to fur­ther our knowl­edge and tol­er­ance of each other’s under­stand­ing of and approach to spir­i­tu­al­ity and belief.

Send your con­tri­bu­tion to admin at hope­ful­spirit dot com!


Tech­no­rati Tags:

You might also like:

{ 4 comments }

1 Rubens Oliveira April 28, 2008 at 7:08 am

About JW Translation of The Bible… I dont think as you.
The New World Translation is a formal equivalence translation rather than a paraphrase.The translation does not contain any of the Apocryphal books, as Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that any claim for canonicity on the part of these writings is without solid foundation.

A 2004 book by Dr. Jason BeDuhn , (Ph.D. is an historian of religion and culture, currently Associate Professor of Religious Studies at Northern Arizona University) states,

“While it is difficult to quantify this sort of analysis, it can be said the NW emerges as the most accurate of the translations … judging by the passages we have looked at.”

Commentator Alexander Thomson wrote,

“We heartily recommend the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures, published in 1950 by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.”

Thomas Winter considers the Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures (part of the NWT project) as

“highly useful” toward mastery of biblical Greek.Winter relates that the translation “is thoroughly up-to-date and consistently accurate.”

In addition, Charles Francis Potter has stated about NWT:

“Apart from a few semantic peculiarities like translating the Greek word stauros, as “stake” instead of “cross,” and the oftenstartling use of the colloquial and the vernacular, the anonymous translators have certainly rendered the best manuscript texts, both Greek and Hebrew, with scholarly ability and acumen.”

2 Dan King April 28, 2008 at 7:30 am

Rubens,
I recognize that some people have expressed opinions related to the relative accuracy of the NW translation, that is not really my point. I am simply basing my opinion off of JW writing that they themselves have given me regarding their Bible. The thing that I am questioning more than anything else is the level of secrecy that seems to surround the creation of this translation in the JW writing that I have been supplied with. The person or group is labeled as being “anonymous”, without explaination as to why. With any other modern tranlation, we can easily know exactly who was a part of translating that version and what credentials they have in doing this type of work. With the NW translation, the appearance implies that any Joe Schmoe that took a “Greek I” class could have been a part of this process. In looking for a solid translation, this simply does nothing to help build confidence in the translation for me.

However, I accept that your points may be absolutely right. I would love to better understand more about the people that have made the comments that you reference, and also accept that they could be very accurate comments.

Personally, for personal study, I like to use my interlinear which helps me study the actual Greek. This is a practice that I would love to see even more “average” Christians do, but I know that it starts requiring more education than most can take. I don’t think that there is any substitute for the “actual” message, and even comparing various modern tranlsations in order to get a better picture.

I also think that there are dangers in putting all of your confidence into one translation as the ONLY accurate translation considering the huge linguistic differences (primary vs. secondary languages, and eastern vs. western mindsets).

3 Mike New April 28, 2008 at 12:54 pm

Very interesting subject matter here. I found myself thoroughly intrigued by both the post and the comments. Thanks!

Mike News last blog post..Giants Win Third Straight! Beat Cardinals 5-1!

4 Jenny May 1, 2008 at 9:45 am

I went to mass once and “read” the book but like you said. Same thing. Different building. I don’t do religion though. It makes me ask to many questions. I’m all about science. *Trying not to rain on anyone’s parade*

Jennys last blog post..Useless Piece of Shit Pretty Phone

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: