What My Neighbor Believes: Jehovah’s Witnesses

by Hopeful Spirit on Sunday, April 27, 2008

By Dan King, Guest Blog­ger On the Horizon

I have recently had sev­eral vis­its from some very faith­ful peo­ple who came to share the hope of their sal­va­tion with me. But as a Min­istry Leader, and an Instruc­tor at a small Bible Col­lege, why would they be so inter­ested in me? Well, accord­ing to them, I’ve got it all wrong! While I read the “same” Bible as them, we have very dif­fer­ent inter­pre­ta­tions about what we believe.

So I wanted to dig in a lit­tle bit and fig­ure out what I should believe. And as a stu­dent of the Bible, I wanted to try to stay as objec­tive as I could. I really wanted to dis­cover the truth in the dif­fer­ences between what we believed. What I dis­cov­ered is some­thing that I hope helps you to under­stand these dif­fer­ences, but also gives you some­thing prac­ti­cal to take with you when it comes to deal­ing with these differences.

I also have to say that my views have drawn praise and harsh crit­i­cism. But rather than tak­ing my word for it, and judg­ing what I have writ­ten, I sim­ply chal­lenge you to take it to the Word your­self. The best way to get to the truth is to find it on your own. Just ask the Holy Spirit to guide you in find­ing it. Here is a sum­mary of what I learned, with links to the full posts on each of these topics.

The Trans­la­tion Problem

Before I got into any fun­da­men­tal beliefs, it was impor­tant for me to under­stand the dif­fer­ence in where we were get­ting our infor­ma­tion. Tech­ni­cally, we read the “same” Bible, but dif­fer­ent trans­la­tions. The Jehovah’s Wit­ness orga­ni­za­tion uses what it called the New World Trans­la­tion, and they believe that it is the only cor­rect ver­sion. While I was not able to get my hands on one while writ­ing this series, I did read a bunch of their own mate­r­ial about this trans­la­tion. Ulti­mately, this trans­la­tion raises lots of red flags for me because of it’s secre­tive nature in who trans­lated it, and how it was trans­lated. Most other stan­dard Bible ver­sions doc­u­ment quite well who was involved, and what meth­ods are used. Hav­ing trans­parency in trans­la­tion allows peo­ple to see and ques­tion the meth­ods. Keep­ing every­thing secret does not allow for the same level of crit­i­cism, and can bring the reli­a­bil­ity of the trans­la­tion into question.

Click here to read further.

Inter­pre­ta­tion Flaws: Core Beliefs

One of the fun­da­men­tal beliefs of the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses is that Jesus has already returned and has estab­lished His King­dom here on earth. They even claim the date when this event hap­pened. One of the biggest prob­lems with this is that not only has the “date” moved sev­eral times, it is also based on flawed inter­pre­ta­tion for dat­ing spe­cific events in the Scrip­tures. The time-frame was also deter­mined by break­ing one of the fun­da­men­tal rules of exe­ge­sis. Basi­cally, it seems that spe­cific prophecy two dif­fer­ent places regard­ing two very dif­fer­ent events have been com­bined to help explain each other. One could eas­ily shat­ter this whole idea sim­ply by apply­ing some basic inter­pre­ta­tion standards.

Click here to read further.

Inter­pre­ta­tion Flaws: Reli­gious Practices

One of the prac­tices I saw that I wanted to study was the sep­a­ra­tion from any gov­ern­ment author­ity. Because the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses believe that Jesus has already returned and taken His place on the throne, estab­lish­ing a new King­dom here on earth, they do not rec­og­nize the author­ity of any other gov­ern­ment sys­tem. Not only is the lack of sub­mis­sion to gov­ern­ment author­i­ties (there is no author­ity that God has not put into place, good or bad) not Bib­li­cal, it is also founded on flawed core beliefs (men­tioned above). There also seems to be hypocrisy when they expect the pro­tec­tion of the gov­ern­ment, but refuse to par­tic­i­pate in it. They will even use the government’s jus­tice sys­tem to fight for their right to not rec­og­nize the gov­ern­ment … but don’t you have to rec­og­nize the author­ity of that jus­tice sys­tem in order to use it to fight your case?

Click here to read further.

Inter­pre­ta­tion Flaws: Diety of Jesus

While the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses accept Jesus as the proph­e­sied Mes­siah, they deny His deity. The idea here is that they look at Him as a “cre­ated being” which means that, as a cre­ation of God, He could not be God. As God’s first cre­ated being, He has been ordained as the com­ing king tasked with rul­ing over God’s King­dom. While the the­ol­ogy of the Trin­ity is one of the most dif­fi­cult things in Chris­tian­ity to truly grasp, the Scrip­tures are very clear that Jesus, while sep­a­rate from God the Father (and the Holy Spirit), is still fully God Himself.

Click here to read further.

The Role of Chris­tians in Deal­ing with Jehovah’s Witnesses

While I believe that the entire fun­da­men­tal belief sys­tem prac­ticed by the Jehovah’s Wit­nesses is wrong, I am still quite con­victed as a Chris­t­ian to present an appro­pri­ate response. Jesus never called me to debate peo­ple into sub­mis­sion or fight some­one until they say “uncle.” He did, how­ever, call me to love peo­ple. It is impor­tant to under­stand the dif­fer­ences between our belief sys­tems, but this is not a license to go pick a fight. I think that the next time my vis­i­tors come to my house, I want to do some­thing nice for them with­out debat­ing a sin­gle word. I will let my love for them as God’s cre­ated beings and my actions speak the­o­log­i­cal truths and points of doc­trine that I could ever speak to them. The rest is up to the Holy Spirit.

Click here to read further.

Amen.

Invi­ta­tion to Serve as a Guest Blogger

I invite you to con­tribute to an ongo­ing dis­cus­sion On the Hori­zon about the var­i­ous belief sys­tems and, more par­tic­u­larly, what the many dif­fer­ent churches believe and teach. The invi­ta­tion extends to those who, like me, are spir­i­tu­ally walk­ing beyond the walls of orga­nized reli­gion and per­sons of all dif­fer­ent faiths, not just Chris­tians, in order to fur­ther our knowl­edge and tol­er­ance of each other’s under­stand­ing of and approach to spir­i­tu­al­ity and belief.

Send your con­tri­bu­tion to admin at hope­ful­spirit dot com!


Wel­come back to On the Hori­zon! So glad you’re vis­it­ing again. Be sure to leave a com­ment and add any posts that you like to the var­i­ous social book­mark­ing sites using the links just below the posts. Thanks for stop­ping by!

Tech­no­rati Tags:

You might also like:

{ 4 comments }

1 Rubens Oliveira Monday, April 28, 2008 at 7:08 am

About JW Trans­la­tion of The Bible… I dont think as you.
The New World Trans­la­tion is a for­mal equiv­a­lence trans­la­tion rather than a paraphrase.The trans­la­tion does not con­tain any of the Apoc­ryphal books, as Jehovah’s Wit­nesses believe that any claim for canon­ic­ity on the part of these writ­ings is with­out solid foundation.

A 2004 book by Dr. Jason BeDuhn , (Ph.D. is an his­to­rian of reli­gion and cul­ture, cur­rently Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor of Reli­gious Stud­ies at North­ern Ari­zona Uni­ver­sity) states,

While it is dif­fi­cult to quan­tify this sort of analy­sis, it can be said the NW emerges as the most accu­rate of the trans­la­tions … judg­ing by the pas­sages we have looked at.”

Com­men­ta­tor Alexan­der Thom­son wrote,

“We heartily rec­om­mend the New World Trans­la­tion of the Chris­t­ian Greek Scrip­tures, pub­lished in 1950 by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.”

Thomas Win­ter con­sid­ers the King­dom Inter­lin­ear Trans­la­tion of the Greek Scrip­tures (part of the NWT project) as

highly use­ful” toward mas­tery of bib­li­cal Greek.Winter relates that the trans­la­tion “is thor­oughly up-to-date and con­sis­tently accurate.”

In addi­tion, Charles Fran­cis Pot­ter has stated about NWT:

Apart from a few seman­tic pecu­liar­i­ties like trans­lat­ing the Greek word stau­ros, as “stake” instead of “cross,” and the often­star­tling use of the col­lo­quial and the ver­nac­u­lar, the anony­mous trans­la­tors have cer­tainly ren­dered the best man­u­script texts, both Greek and Hebrew, with schol­arly abil­ity and acumen.”

2 Dan King Monday, April 28, 2008 at 7:30 am

Rubens,
I rec­og­nize that some peo­ple have expressed opin­ions related to the rel­a­tive accu­racy of the NW trans­la­tion, that is not really my point. I am sim­ply bas­ing my opin­ion off of JW writ­ing that they them­selves have given me regard­ing their Bible. The thing that I am ques­tion­ing more than any­thing else is the level of secrecy that seems to sur­round the cre­ation of this trans­la­tion in the JW writ­ing that I have been sup­plied with. The per­son or group is labeled as being “anony­mous”, with­out explaina­tion as to why. With any other mod­ern tran­la­tion, we can eas­ily know exactly who was a part of trans­lat­ing that ver­sion and what cre­den­tials they have in doing this type of work. With the NW trans­la­tion, the appear­ance implies that any Joe Schmoe that took a “Greek I” class could have been a part of this process. In look­ing for a solid trans­la­tion, this sim­ply does noth­ing to help build con­fi­dence in the trans­la­tion for me.

How­ever, I accept that your points may be absolutely right. I would love to bet­ter under­stand more about the peo­ple that have made the com­ments that you ref­er­ence, and also accept that they could be very accu­rate comments.

Per­son­ally, for per­sonal study, I like to use my inter­lin­ear which helps me study the actual Greek. This is a prac­tice that I would love to see even more “aver­age” Chris­tians do, but I know that it starts requir­ing more edu­ca­tion than most can take. I don’t think that there is any sub­sti­tute for the “actual” mes­sage, and even com­par­ing var­i­ous mod­ern tranl­sa­tions in order to get a bet­ter picture.

I also think that there are dan­gers in putting all of your con­fi­dence into one trans­la­tion as the ONLY accu­rate trans­la­tion con­sid­er­ing the huge lin­guis­tic dif­fer­ences (pri­mary vs. sec­ondary lan­guages, and east­ern vs. west­ern mindsets).

3 Mike New Monday, April 28, 2008 at 12:54 pm

Very inter­est­ing sub­ject mat­ter here. I found myself thor­oughly intrigued by both the post and the com­ments. Thanks!

Mike News last blog post..Giants Win Third Straight! Beat Car­di­nals 5–1!

4 Jenny Thursday, May 1, 2008 at 9:45 am

I went to mass once and “read” the book but like you said. Same thing. Dif­fer­ent build­ing. I don’t do reli­gion though. It makes me ask to many ques­tions. I’m all about sci­ence. *Try­ing not to rain on anyone’s parade*

Jen­nys last blog post..Use­less Piece of Shit Pretty Phone

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: