
“So here’s what I want you to do, God helping you: Take your everyday, ordinary life—your sleeping, eating, going-to-work, and walking-around life—and place it before God as an offering. Embracing what God does for you is the best thing you can do for him. Don’t become so well-adjusted to your culture that you fit into it without even thinking. Instead, fix your attention on God. You’ll be changed from the inside out. Readily recognize what he wants from you, and quickly respond to it. Unlike the culture around you, always dragging you down to its level of immaturity, God brings the best out of you, develops well-formed maturity in you.”
Romans 12:1
In what ways have you “conformed to this world” in your own life? Then, share the story of how God worked through you to “renew your mind” in that situation.
Many Christians talk about “conforming to the world” as a way of describing behavior that they consider wrongful or sinful. They contrast such behavior with the principles for daily living they believe are contained in the Bible. Concluding that on a specific occasion or in a particular circumstance they have in some way fallen short of God’s expectations for them, they state that they have “conformed to the world” and seek forgiveness. In that sense, “the world” is equated with concepts of evil, malice, falling prey to temptation and, ultimately, not deserving God’s boundless and unconditional love.
That mindset has never resonated with me and I have never used that terminology either to conceptualize or analyze my failures.
Rather, I focus upon the choices I make. Some of my choices prove to be more successful than others. We have been given free will and it is more productive for me prefer to emphasize that fact because, in doing so, one idea remains at the forefront for me: I am accountable for my own behavior and actions. I am responsible for the choices I make. I am the one who must accept and live with the consequences of my choices.
The concept of “choice” is at the forefront of Americans’ thoughts these days as we are bombarded with information about the upcoming election. As voters, we must choose the candidates we will support and for whom we will cast our votes. We must study the issues, evaluate the candidates’ strengths and weaknesses, as we define those characteristics, attempt to separate the facts from the hyperbole, and make a reasoned choice about which candidates and propositions to endorse (publicly or within the confines of our own heart and mind).
After we cast our votes, we — the American people — must be accountable in the days ahead for the consequences of the choices we make. We cannot blame anyone else.
It is easy to get caught up in the political frenzy, allowing the “culture around us” to “drag[ us] down to its level of immaturity,” especially in this age of twenty-four hour news and the proliferation of endless amounts of information — much of it duplicative minutiae — via the Internet. On October 8, 2008, Michelle Obama appeared onThe Daily Show with Jon Stewart. She opined that, during the twenty month campaign for the Presidency, every detail of the Obama family’s lives has been vetted. The focus upon the two potential First Ladies has been intense — arguably more intense than during past campaigns. She believes that is due in part to the fact that there is so much time to be filled up by the media that “we become part of the filler. The conversations continue. Okay, now we know what the candidates are like … let’s take a look at their wives and their houses … “ She finds the scrutiny fair, though, believing that Americans must have a “comfort level” with the candidates’ spouse, as well as with the candidate for office.
With so much data bombarding us on a continual basis, we have to be cautious voters, able to separate the fluff from the substance, the nonsense from the critical information needed to make an intelligent, informed, well-founded choice when we enter the voting booth.
For many of us, our faith and beliefs inform our political choices. Many people do not look beyond the values they believe a particular candidate holds dear to the substantive issues he/she will be asked to deal with, instead counting upon those values to guide him/her and inform his/her choices and decisions once he/she assumes office. Others argue that values are not as important as intellectual prowess, believing that the ability to analyze, organize, and negotiate challenges are most critical to effective leadership.
I suspect that most people’s analytical approach can best be described as landing somewhere in the middle of that decision-making continuüm.
For many believers, the danger lies in becoming “so well-adjusted to your culture that you fit into it without even thinking.” Religious leaders and organizations are offering advice and counsel to voters, with some going so far as to print ballot guidelines that their followers can take into the voting booth with them to assure that they vote in accordance with their leaders’ recommendations and endorsements. Christians sometimes automatically adopt the candidates and positions backed by their particular denomination or congregation without stopping to consider for themselves why they should cast their votes in that fashion. In my opinion, votes cast in that manner are votes squandered.
On the contrary, it’s my choice to make. It’s my vote I will be casting on November 4, 2008. It’s my “everyday, ordinary life” that will be impacted by the decisions made and policies enacted by the next leaders who take office on a national, state, and local level.
Before casting my vote, I must study the candidates’ positions on the issues, take into account the values they espouse, and discern what the Divine Spirit is saying to me about the choices before me. I am called upon by the Divine Creator to remain strong, independent, and use the intellect given me to resist being dragged down by the culture of mud-slinging, name-calling, misinformation, refusal to answer questions posed during a debate directly, and overall “spin” employed by the campaigns, refusing to sink to the level of immaturity that characterizes the American political process. Instead, I must search for the best and most important qualities possessed by the various candidates and weigh the important, long-ranging impact each will have on resolution of the key issues. I must endeavor to vote with a “well-formed maturity.”
There have been times when I have regretted the votes I cast, the prime example being that I actually voted for George W. Bush. Not once. Twice. As I write this today, I am extremely embarrassed to admit that. At the time, I felt that I had studied the issues, evaluated the candidates’ strengths and weaknesses, and made a fully informed, supportable decision when I stepped into the voting booth in both 2000 and 2004.
However, it is apparent that I, along with many other Americans, failed to make a wise choice. I was not prescient, of course, so I could not predict what President Bush would ultimately do to this country and its citizens. I believed him to be a man of faith and was admittedly influenced by his proclamations of belief. But the Presidency of George W. Bush has been an abject failure on virtually every front. The Divine Spirit has renewed my mind and conformed my thoughts over the past eight years, allowing me to see just how wrong I was to have voted for him.
I pray that eight years from now I don’t feel the same way about the manner in which I plan to cast my votes this coming November 4, 2008.








{ 1 comment }
“Before casting my vote, I must study the candidates’ positions on the issues, take into account the values they espouse, and discern what the Divine Spirit is saying to me about the choices before me.”
So very true. I’d like to invite you to view my blog post, Obama’s Vote.
Feel free to contact me. God bless.
Cindy´s latest blog post: Obama’s Vote
Comments on this entry are closed.