
What is one thing you will commit to do in 2009 that will draw you closer to Jesus?
(This is not a New Year’s Resolution)
“Ma’am, I’d like to talk to you about Proposition 8.”
It was a sunny Saturday morning in Northern California, just a little after 10:00 a.m. I was not yet dressed, so I answered the door in my robe. The man I found standing on my doorstep, leaning on the railing casually, had a stack of pamphlets and other literature in his hand. He looked like an out of uniform soldier — his hair was cut short, neatly trimmed and combed into place. His plaid button-down shirt was as crisply pressed as his Dockers trousers which boasted a perfectly lined crease down the front of each unwrinkled leg.
I instinctively knew when I glanced at him for the first time that this well-groomed, polite gentleman and I would find no common ground on the issue at hand.
“I don’t really think we have anything to talk about, but thanks for stopping by,” I said as gently as I could as I began slowly closing the door.
“Marriage is between a man and a woman, ma’am,” he said hurriedly in a ploy to stop me from terminating our brief encounter.
It worked.
I quickly pulled the door open fully and replied, “I don’t believe that,” challenging him to defend his position. I could have told him I didn’t wish to discuss the issue further or that I had already made up my mind about how I intended to vote or … provided an infinite number of other reasons why the two of us should not spend time on that beautiful autumn morning arguing with each other about an issue about which we both knew we would never achieve consensus.
Instead, he took my bait. “But that’s what the Bible says,” he continued.
I felt my cheeks getting hot and knew that if I looked in a mirror at that precise moment, I would see that my ears were as bright as Rudolph’s nose on Christmas Eve. As though I were two separate beings, part of me recoiled at the invitation to debate the man who had dedicated his Saturday morning to ringing the doorbells of total strangers in order to press his case. While another part of me eagerly spoiled for the fight.
“Look, I’ve studied the Bible — all passages that could even remotely be interpreted as relating to this issue. At length. I simply don’t believe as you believe. I have no desire to stand here arguing with you because neither of us is going to convince the other of the correctness of our position. So how about if we just agree to disagree? You have a nice day,” I said, as I again began to shut the door.
“Can I leave you some literature to read about what the Bible really says about marriage?” he queried.
I fell back on the response I always provide when someone rings my doorbell to push an agenda with which I disagree. “Sure. Leave me all of it!” I said enthusiastically.
“Oh! Well … sure, I guess I could do that. Will you distribute it to your friends and coworkers?” he said innocently.
“No,” I replied sincerely. “I’m going to burn it.”
At that moment, our eyes met and he finally accepted that he would not succeed in converting me. Still … he was not quite ready to concede total defeat.
“I see that there is another registered voter living in this house. Is ______ at home? Could I talk to him? Do you know how he will be voting?” he asked.
“No, he’s not home. And he will be voting ‘no’ just as I will,” I replied matter-of-factly.
With that, he practically ran down the steps, mumbling “have a nice day” as he scurried toward the sidewalk.
That afternoon, I purchased my first “No on 8″ sign and installed it on my front lawn. By the time November 4, 2008, rolled around, however, there was no longer a sign there — three “No on 8″ signs had been stolen from my front yard in the weeks just prior to the election.
The evening of November 4, 2008, brought mixed blessings. I was joyous when I saw the words “President-Elect Obama” flash on the television screen as the major news networks declared the election results. But hope turned to despair in the ensuing hours and days as the ballots were counted and it became clear that a majority of California voters approved of injecting discrimination into the state’s constitution.
The protests around the state signaled that the fight for equality was far from over.
![]()
This time of year, we sing about angelic choirs bringing glad tidings of “peace on earth, good will toward men.” I have never succeeded in reconciling those carols with passages such as this one:
“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
Matthew 10:34–39
The modern language translation, The Message, puts it this way:
“Don’t think I’ve come to make life cozy. I’ve come to cut—make a sharp knife-cut between son and father, daughter and mother, bride and mother-in-law—cut through these cozy domestic arrangements and free you for God. Well-meaning family members can be your worst enemies. If you prefer father or mother over me, you don’t deserve me. If you prefer son or daughter over me, you don’t deserve me.
If you don’t go all the way with me, through thick and thin, you don’t deserve me. If your first concern is to look after yourself, you’ll never find yourself. But if you forget about yourself and look to me, you’ll find both yourself and me.”
Matthew 10:34–39
The truth is that when that nice gentleman rang my doorbell, I felt as compelled to speak the truth, as I believe it, as he felt called to get up on that day and spend his valuable time knocking on the doors of strangers in order to convince them to vote for Proposition 8. I have no doubt that he believed he was doing the right thing. Since the odds are good that we both claim to be believers and followers of Christ, there is also a good chance that he, like me, would claim inspiration from the Spirit to speak out in favor of our core beliefs.
Is that notion plausible when he, along with his fellow Christians who voted for and assured the passage of Proposition 8, was not just misguided, but flat-out wrong? Completely, if you take Jesus at his word in stating his true purpose for taking on human form.
Click here to read Part Two.

Writers Offering Their Finest for the January 9, 2009 WOOF Contest. Top Picks:
Poetry
- Dragon Blogger & Jennifer M. Scott – The Fallen Knight — a poem in the fantasy genre about a knight hunted in the snow.
- Dragon Blogger – Madness for Love — A random twitter poem based on 7 words turned out to be about searching for love.
Non-Fiction, Philiosophical, Opinion Piece
- Hopeful Spirit — Reflections on Proposition 8: California’s Shame — A two-part discussion, from a progressive Christian perspective, of Proposition 8. The second part is found here.
- JHS, Esq. — Monday Musings: Boxing Day — She says, “In recent years, I have done very little decorating for Christmas. It took me a long time to figure out why I was no longer getting excited about the holiday … but I think I finally found the answer.”
Flash Fiction, Fiction
- Jennifer M Scott – Everyman – about a serial killer.
Brought to you by PlotDog Press with the Serial Suspense Screenplay “Intervention.”
You might also like:







{ 13 comments }
I find it hard to believe you have, “…studied the Bible — all passages that could even remotely be interpreted as relating to this issue. At length.” and conclude that the biblical pattern for marriage is anything other than a man and a woman. There are over 100 verses that refer to a father and a mother. Eph 5:31 says, “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”
While you are free in this country to believe what you want, you are not really free, especially if you claim to be a Christian, to misstate the Bible.
Faith and Facts´s latest blog post: Merry Xmas 2008
Thank you, Hopeful Spirit! I wish you a wonderful and very meaningful New Year! Thank you for your faithful contributions on the blogsphere!
Viola Jaynes´s latest blog post: New Years Wishes For You
First, I wish you a Happy New Year. May GOD enlighten you in all ways as He shines His light on our world.
… but how can you come to a conclusion regarding relationships that is so at odds with life-giving? Friendships are wonderful but they do not form marriage no matter how you cut it.
As a Californian who is saddened by our sliding slope of morality and the need to speak for life and all GOD means that to include, I was compelled to vote for Prop 8. But I can still love you and even your partner without condoning the acts that do not line up in any way with GOD.
Be blessed with all righteousness!
@Emery: Why do you assume that any relationship must be “life-giving” in order to be valid? And why do you assume that I am gay as is evident by your use of the term “partner”?
There are many marriages — same and opposite sex — that do not include children. Still more into which children are incorporated by means other than conception and childbirth. Are you saying that those marriages are not valid or worthy of recognition simply because they don’t involve “life-giving” in the traditional sense? What then would you say to those children of such relationships?
Moreover, it is dangerous to make assumptions. I am not, in fact, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered. I am a heterosexual woman and have been married to a man for many years. That does not mean that I cannot stand in solidarity and fight for equality with my gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered brothers and sisters.
Lastly, you have the right to believe as you see fit and worship accordingly. However, the problem with Proposition 8 is that too many like yourself were unable to separate the religious from the secular. Proposition 8 has NOTHING to do with religion or religious beliefs. It is a SECULAR law and, as such, subject to Constitutional scrutiny which is cannot pass as I predict the California Supreme Court will declare. Sadly, too many people, voted, as you apparently did, from a place of religious conviction rather than understanding of the civil system of laws. That’s why it passed, but it will not stand.
Christians in diverse cultures such as California must learn that they cannot impose their will, beliefs, traditions, and practices on society as a whole.
Moreover, there are many, many Christians who, like me, have studied the Bible and concluded that it does not say what the patriarchal church has insisted for centuries that it says on the issue of sexual orientation, as well as many other subjects.
Your “scale of morality” is not mine and that is ok. You can live in accordance with your moral compass and I with mine. But neither of us can impose our “scale of morality” upon other persons via the government and enactment of laws that are blatantly discriminatory and serve to deny equal rights to all persons irrespective of their religious beliefs or lack thereof.
You and I can love each other, but you do not have a right to judge me. You can believe what you want about human nature and behavior, but it is not your place to “condone” or not “condone” my choices. It is simply your place to offer unconditional love, acceptance, patience, and most importantly, tolerance!
Happy New Year!
@Faith and Facts: Where, precisely, did I “misstate the Bible”? I would love to hear how I did that, in your estimation. I stated that I have studied the Bible thoroughly and do not beleve that it can be used to deny equal rights under the law to any person or group of persons. I’m sure that you do find that “hard to believe” because you have obviously come to a different conclusion. But that’s how it is and that’s why Christians need to agree to disagree in a loving, Christ-like manner.
However, as to a matter of civil rights under our system of laws, there is no room for disagreement founded upon the religious beliefs of one group. Nor can the religious beliefs of any group(s) be allowed to trump the secular rights granted to any person(s) under the state or federal Constitution.
Sexual orientation is protected under the law. Therefore, marriage cannot be denied to persons of the sex on the basis of their orientation. That is just how the law is written and the courts are finally recognizing that fact.
This argument is no different than arguments in previous decades related to the rights of women or persons of color. Exactly the same rhetoric is being thrown around by the religious right in this country to resist same-sex marriage as was used to argue that miscegenistic laws (prohibiting the marriage or cohabitation of persons of different races) should remain on the books.
For the record, those laws remained intact well into this century. In fact, the man who is about to be our next President was born to a man and woman who, under the law of that time, could not marry because one was black and the other white.
Sadly, there are still many churches that aren’t even discussing the issue of ordaining women, much less same-sex marriage. To me, that’s barbaric. Of course, I come from a lifetime of membership in a group that began ordaining women in 1970.
For me, those historical realities put this issue into perspective and compels only one conclusion.
Happy belated New Year! I eagerly await the next post(s) in this series.
yinyang´s latest blog post: Jon Stewart as Willy Wonka? Dick Cheney as Elmer Fudd?
I am so thankful to be living in Massachusetts where my wife and I live in peace and quiet. We are expecting a baby in April and happily married, just like any other ordinary family.
Melissan´s latest blog post: Why I Love to Watch the Biggest Loser
thank you, Hopeful Spirit, for all you said to the young man on your doorstep and to the commenters here. I can only hope to be so eloquent when I am called on in similar circumstance.
Blessings on you and yours in 2009!
Not Fainthearted´s latest blog post: Friday Five – First Edition 2009
Happy belated New Year! I eagerly await the next post(s) in this series.
“Marriage is between a man and a woman, ma’am,” he said hurriedly in a ploy to stop me from terminating our brief encounter.
We are expecting a baby in April and happily married, just like any other ordinary family.
It was very good post, it helped me in finding a good affiliate, thanks.
i hate anyone who comes door to door and bothers me even if i do agree with their message i want them gone
Comments on this entry are closed.